Maven is a Survivor. 

The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism

“What we have done for ourselves alone dies with us; what we have done for others and the world remains and is immortal.” Albert Pike 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Links
Search maven&meddler for content below

 

 


XML
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to My AOL
Add to Technorati Favorites!

 

 

 

 

Powered by Squarespace
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Wednesday
    03Feb2010

    Is Coke losing its fizz. CSPI thinks so.

    I just received the following from from the Executive Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), Michael Jacobson.

    How would you feel if you had to pay $8.50 a gallon for gasoline?*

    Then why on Earth would you pay that much for water and high-fructose corn syrup?

    That’s how much Coke costs in those new 7.5-ounce, 90-calorie cans.  Calorie-counters may appreciate the small size (90 calories) but dollar-counters beware:  We did a little math and it turns out that Coke in the new can costs between 50- and 140-percent more than Coke in the old 12-ounce cans.  Basically, Coke is charging two or three cents more per ounce for Coke in a smaller can—and this from a company that throws temper tantrums when lawmakers propose a one-cent-per-ounce tax on soda!

    I think time might be running out for Coca-Cola, as parents, public health officials, and others are beginning to work together to reduce consumption of disease-promoting soft drinks.  That’s the topic of my latest column in The Huffington Post.  Please feel free to weigh in on this topic in the comments section, which I’ll be checking throughout the afternoon and tomorrow.

    Sincerely,
    Michael F. Jacobson
    Executive Director
    Center for Science in the Public Interest

    P.S. Also, we haven’t launched it formally yet, but you can now keep up with CSPI’s activities by becoming a fan on our Facebook page.  (And later this month, we’ll be relaunching our redesigned homepage.  Stay tuned!)

    (*Okay, maybe we should pay a little more for gasoline.  But you get my point.)

    Hmmm. It’s certainly worthy of some thought.

    Tuesday
    02Feb2010

    Cleaning for a reason gives help to cancer patients

    Wow, I wish I’d known about this when I was undergoing treatment! What an outstanding idea: housecleaning services around the country donating time to help cancer patients.

    Cleaning for A Reason should be commended - and supported. Here’s what their website says:

    Fighting cancer is difficult enough, but living with it is even tougher - and that’s where the Cleaning for A Reason Foundation steps in. This newly formed nonprofit offers free professional housecleaning, and maid services to improve the lives of women undergoing treatment for cancer - any type of cancer.

    Hey, if you know a woman with cancer - any type of cancer - do something really big for her. Give her the gift of a clean house.

    Click to read more ...

    Monday
    01Feb2010

    Radiation therapy safe, effective and lifesaving

    There is a good article in The New York Times that will, no doubt be misinterpreted by many cancer patients considering whether or not to have lifesaving radiation therapy.

    The article is about several horrible, and completely avoidable, ‘accidents’ where cancer patients in New York state hospitals received overdoses of radiation.

    The bottom line, from me anyway - and I had seven weeks of radiation therapy for my Stage IIIa breast cancer - is this:

    This is what you get from a for-profit, often ad hoc, based system of medicine.

    This is why medical consumers must understand why it is so important to do their homework, get second opinions, and go to the best facility possible. That isn’t easy for a sick person. I know. But I can attest that my treatment at the best cancer center in the world - M. D. Anderson - was no more expensive than had I gotten it in Reno, Nevada.

    At centers of excellence - like M. D. Anderson or Sloan-Kettering, for example - they are not doing radiation therapy as a sideline, value added service. It’s an integral part of the institution’s mission. There are more hours, more patients, successfully treated there than at the average hospital - therefore the technicians and providers have exponentially more experience. The safety protocols are rigorous to say the least.

    Please, don’t base your decision to get radiation therapy or not on these horrible examples. Base your decision on sound, critical thinking and evidence of efficacy. And go where they do a very lot of it.

    Here is a good article by one of my team members at The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas in the newest edition of Cancerwise:

    Click to read more ...

    Saturday
    30Jan2010

    The Fordson Snow Machine: ahead of its time in 1929

    Just when you think that we know it all … what prevented this idea from ‘getting sticky’ as Malcolm Gladwell would put it and taking off. The thing looks so unwieldy and unstable, yet it isn’t. Watch the entire video, as you’ll see them do amazing things - even on grass.

    Thanks to alert reader, Bob N. for this tip.

    Saturday
    30Jan2010

    Save your money on multi-vitamins

    From the Tufts University Health & Nutrition Letter ( The Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy ) the final word is save your money on those expensive multi-vitamins. This isn’t exactly breaking news, as I’ve been seeing small mentions of this before now, and already quit taking them. Tufts, however, is reporting that “the largest study ever of multimitamin use among older women has found that the pills made no significant difference in the risk of cancer, heart disease or overall mortality.”

    The Tufts data is from research in the Archives of Internal Medicine, by Marian L. Neuhouser, Ph.D, of the Fred Hutchinson Research Center and colleagues. They noted that although the reasons and motivations of those who take multivitamins are wide ranging and vary greatly, fueled by product claims from the vitamin and supplement industry, yet “scientific data supporting the benefits of most supplements are lacking.”

    Click to read more ...

    Saturday
    30Jan2010

    Stress and memory? Good causal links.

    In these highly stressful times, it might be good to know what adverse effects stress has on higher brain function, and what we can do to mitigate those negative responses.

    Stress, in and of itself, is not bad. However, our response to stress is where events can take a wrong turn, sometimes leading to ill health, toxic relationships and more.

    Learning to cope in controlled ways to stress, and to manage our response is the key.

    So, what to do?

    Well, here are a few ideas, although I don’t recommend them.

    Click to read more ...

    Saturday
    30Jan2010

    Depression and a thinner cerebral cortex?

    The question here is whether the depression causes the thining or the thinning causes the depression.

    Monday
    25Jan2010

    Multidisciplinary approach helps cancer patients

    Being a nearly eight year survivor of Stage IIIa Breast Cancer, and having had all treatment at The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, I’m a huge believer in the multidisciplinary model of treating cancer. I believe it was a crucial part of my survival and recovery.

    It makes so much sense. Get all the practictioners in there to consult and confer as a team right from the start. About every other appointment for Chemotherapy, I would first be seen by my Clinical Oncologist, then a team of doctors ( radiation oncologisty, oncological surgeon, plastic surgeon, pathologist, nutritionist and others ) would come round to evaluate me, and then step into another room where my primary Oncologist would, essentially, defend her case.

    By the time I was ready to proceed to each subsequent step in the process of arresting my cancer, the doctor that I was ‘handed off’ to was already very familiar with me and my case. The close working relationships were standard operating procedure all the way through my treatment and recovery phases.

    Unfortunately, this type of treatment isn’t usually available outside of a teaching hospital. When you are a patient of the average local practictioner, he may confer with other collegues or not. Your case may reach the local ‘tumor board’ for evaluation or not.

    Multidisciplinary teams should be the Standard of Care. This goes for breast cancer or prostate cancer as you can read below.

    maven

    When Specialists Confer, Patients Benefit

    Network - Winter 2010


    By Mary Brolley

    It all started with feedback.

    For several years, Deborah Kuban, M.D., asked men who’d been treated for prostate cancer at M. D. Anderson how they felt about it.

    Click to read more ...

    Sunday
    24Jan2010

    Flicker in my backyard

    This winter, I’ve made a point of getting the suet feeders out and have been handsomely rewarded for my efforts with Flickers and Downy Woodpeckers.

    Click to read more ...

    Saturday
    23Jan2010

    Creationism vs. science? 

    Saturday
    23Jan2010

    Repair or replace those aging appliances?

    With all the home renovations we’ve done in the last couple of years, it’s been a big issue around here - repair, replace or what? Getting more energy effecient is a big consideration with utility prices going nowhere but up.

    This video will give you some great things to think about in making the decision to replace. I can also tell you that in these times, a lot of those big box home stores are actually willing to deal on price for new appliances.

    Click to read more ...

    Thursday
    21Jan2010

    A great Pan Am Clipper short film

    Wednesday
    20Jan2010

    Geo-technical aspects of the Haitian earthquake

    I was getting a lot of inquiries about the various technical aspects of the earthquake that devastated Haiti, so I emailed my neighbor who is a geologist with a background in seismology. Here is her reply:

    “This little request of yours could turn into a major research project, Cindy.  Try these links.  They’re a little more technical than what you generally find in the newspapers.”

    Hmmmm.

    Well, here are some cool links for the more scientific of my readers:

    http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/poster/2010/20100112.jpg

    http://www.iris.edu/hq/files/programs/education_and_outreach/retm/tm_100112_haiti/haiti_flash.swf

    http://www.gdacs.org/reports.asp?eventType=EQ&ID=73957&system=asgard&location=HTI&alertlevel=Orange&glide_no

    http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/disasters/Haiti-Earthquake-2010.asp

    http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/rels/011310.html

     

    This is pretty interesting, considering how relatively young the science of earthquake forecasting is:

    In 2008, Paul Mann, Eric Calais and colleagues presented a paper at the Caribbean Conference and David Manaker, Eric Calais and colleagues published a journal article both forecasting a 7.2 magnitude earthquake in the area of Haiti, Jamaica and the Dominican Republic.  The forecast was based on an integration of geologic information on the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone with GPS data collected in the region.

    Sunday
    17Jan2010

    Really ready to lose weight? Here's the simplest way possible.

    And, not a bit of calorie counting involved.

    It’s going to cost you $5.00 plus postage.

    You eat normal, real, whole foods.

    You eat like Grandma used to.

    You eat like they do in France.

    Sounds impossible? Not.

    Snag yourself a copy of ‘Food Rules’ by Michael Pollan. At a mere $5.00 at Amazon.com, you can’t afford not to get a copy. I downloaded it to my Kindle, but then ordered the paper copy for reference.

    ‘Food Rules’ is a simple, 70 page manual for how to eat. Simple, easy to follow rules that once learned will forever banish junk food, engineered faux food products, overeating, chemicals and additives from your life and your kitchen. With a bit of daily exercise, this is quite simply all you need.

    Click to read more ...

    Sunday
    10Jan2010

    Sopwith Camel and Spitfire flying in formation

    Sunday
    10Jan2010

    A couple of Lancairs running the California coast. Sweet.

    Sunday
    10Jan2010

    Any wonder why the owl is my fav bird?

    New Photron SA-2 High Definition High Speed Camera. Shot of ‘Checkers’ the eagle owl, 1000fps 1920x1080 resolution. Shot by SlowMo

    Sunday
    10Jan2010

    New apps for those on the go

    The new Google app ‘Near me now’  is really appealing and I’m going to download to my iphone as soon as I get this written. The Google folks asked the question ‘have you ever stood outside of a restaurant and wondered if you should go in?’

    As a matter of fact, yes.

    Click to read more ...

    Saturday
    09Jan2010

    Interet hoax update on cancer from NCCN

    I just found this on the NCCN ( National Comprehensive Cancer Network)

     this evening. Since I can’t remove the formatting, I suggest

     you click on the hyperlink and go to the source article.

     

    It has become such a problem, that the National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and individual cancer centers like the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center have posted warnings on their Web sites. Emails offering easy remedies for avoiding and curing cancer are the latest Web influenced trend. To gain credibility, the anonymous authors falsely attribute their work to respected research institutions like Johns Hopkins. This is the case with the so-called “Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins.”

    The gist of this viral email is that cancer therapies of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy do not work against the disease, and people should instead choose a variety of dietary strategies. Traditional therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, work. The evidence is the millions of cancer survivors in the United States today who are alive because of these therapies. We recognize that treatments don’t work in every patient, or sometimes work for awhile and then stop working, and there are some cancers that are more difficult to cure than others. These problems are the focus of ongoing cancer research.

    We’ll go through each statement in the email hoax and provide real responses from Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center experts.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIMS #1 AND 2: Everyone Has Cancer Cells
    Cancer is a genetic disease resulting from a variety of mutations and alterations either inherited from our parents or, more commonly, acquired over time due to environmental exposures and behaviors, such as smoking and poor diet. These alterations turn off important cell growth regulators allowing cells to continually divide unchecked, explains Luis Diaz, a clinician-scientist in the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics. This type of cell is called a malignant or cancer cell. Among the trillions of cells in the human body, inevitably everyone has some abnormal or atypical cells that possess some of the characteristics of cancer cells; most resolve themselves and never result in cancer, says Diaz. There is no single or standard test for cancer. There are ways to screen for certain cancers with tests such as colonoscopy for colon cancer, mammography for breast cancer, PSA for prostate cancer, and the Pap smear for cervical cancer, and these tests can detect cancers in a very early and curable stage. For many cancers, there are currently no screening tests, and they are diagnosed when they begin to cause symptoms.

    Diaz and other Kimmel Cancer Center researchers are working on new tests that detect abnormal DNA shed by cancer cells into blood and body fluids and have the ability to find cancers before they cause any symptoms. Approaches like this could lead to a broad-based screening test for cancer. Tests like these also are being used to detect cancer recurrences and malignant cells left behind following surgery, and can find cancers that are not detectable under the microscope or in X-rays.

    Other researchers are studying cancer stem cells. They are stealth cells that make up just a tiny fraction of a tumor. While small in number, investigators believe they may be the cells that drive certain cancers and lead to cancer recurrence. Therapies that target these cells are now being tested in clinical trials.

    A team of our breast cancer researchers has developed a method that could make it possible to detect breast cancer from the DNA contained in a single drop of blood or body fluid. Although evasive cancer cells are a challenge and the focus of ongoing research, it does not mean, as the email contends, that all patients, even those treated successfully for cancer, have cancers-in-waiting— undetectable but still there. People are treated and completely cured of cancer everyday.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIM #3: A Strong Immune System Destroys Cancer
    When it comes to cancer and the immune system, it is not a matter of strong or weak as the fictional report contends, but rather an issue of recognition. The immune system simply does not recognize cancer. In its complexity, the cancer cell has learned to disguise itself to the immune system as a normal cell. Infected cells send out danger signals setting the immune system in action. Cancer cells do not, explains Elizabeth Jaffee, co-director of cancer immunology and leading expert on cancer and the immune system. By deciphering the methods cancer cells use to make them invisible to the immune system, Jaffee and team have developed cancer vaccines that have successfully triggered immune reactions against prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, leukemia, and multiple myeloma.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIMS #4 AND #5: Cancer is Caused by Nutritional Deficiencies and Supplements Will Correct Them
    Dietary habits and lifestyle choices, such as smoking, contribute to the development of many human cancers, says Kimmel Cancer Center director William Nelson. Our experts recommend a balanced diet (see response #11) as a way of reducing cancer risk. In terms of supplements, Nelson points out that while they may help mediate vitamin deficiencies, taking doses above what the body needs provide no added benefit.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIMS #6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10: Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Harm Normal Cells. Surgery Causes Cancer to Spread:
    Chemotherapy and radiation therapy kill cancer cells with remarkable selectivity, says Nelson. There are some temporary and reversible side effects common to cancer therapies, including hair loss and low blood counts. Limiting and managing these side effects is an integral part of treatment. Surgery is the first line of treatment for many types of cancer. It does not cause cancer to spread. Cancers spread to other tissues and organs as a tumor progresses and cancer cells break away from the original tumor and travel through the bloodstream to other body sites.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIMS #11, 12, 13, AND 14: Cancers Feed on Certain Foods
    The premise is that cancer cells feed on certain foods, and if a person refrains from eating these foods, the cancer will die. According to our experts, a poor diet and obesity associated with a poor diet is a risk factor for the development of cancer. However, there is no evidence that certain foods alter the environment of an existing cancer, at the cellular level, and cause it to either die or grow. Although there is such a thing as tumors that produce mucus, the mucus made by a tumor does not result from drinking milk. And, eating less meat, while a good choice for cancer prevention, does not free up enzymes to attack cancer cells, explains cancer prevention and control expert Elizabeth Platz. Moderation is key, says Platz. As part of a balanced diet, sugar, salt, milk, coffee, tea, meat, and chocolate—the foods the “Update” calls into question—are all safe choices, she says. The real concern with many of these, particularly sugar, is that they add calories to a diet and can lead to obesity, and obesity is a major risk factor for cancer. A balanced nutritious diet, healthy weight, physical activity, and avoiding alcoholic drinks may prevent as many as a third of all cancers. Platz recommends eating at least five servings of fruits and vegetables per day and limiting red and processed meats, such as hot dogs.

    Several Johns Hopkins experts participated in the World Cancer Research Fund - American Institute for Cancer Research report Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective, published in November 2007, which is considered by cancer prevention experts to be an authoritative source of information on diet, physical activity and cancer. Their recommendations for cancer prevention and for good health in general are:

    1. Be as lean as possible without becoming underweight.

    2. Be physically active for at least 30 minutes every day.

    3. Avoid sugary drinks. Limit consumption of energy-dense foods (particularly processed foods high in added sugar, or low in fiber, or high in fat).

    4. Eat more of a variety of vegetables, fruits, whole grains and legumes such as beans.

    5. Limit consumption of red meats (such as beef, pork and lamb) and avoid processed meats.

    6. If consumed at all, limit alcoholic drinks to two for men and one for women a day.

    7. Limit consumption of salty foods and foods processed with salt (sodium).

    8. Don’t use supplements to protect against cancer.

    Our experts recommend that people meet their nutritional needs through their food choices. While vitamin supplements can be helpful in people with nutritional deficiencies, evidence suggests that supplementation above what the body can use provides no added health benefit.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIM #15: Cancer is a Disease of Mind, Body, and Spirit
    Cancer is a disease caused by genetic alterations. Many times, these alterations occur through our own behaviors—cigarette smoking, a poor and unbalanced diet, virus exposures and sunburns, says cancer prevention and control expert John Groopman. How stress, faith, and other factors influence this is largely unknown. We would like people to be happy, loving, and stress free, simply because it is a nice way to live and can contribute to an overall feeling of well being, says Platz. There is no evidence, however, that a person prevents or causes cancer based on his or her state of mind.

    Still, we understand that a cancer diagnosis can make patients and families feel stressed and anxious, and these are not pleasant feelings. So, we offer extensive patient and family services, including a cancer counseling center, pain and palliative care program, chaplain services and a meditation chapel, an image recovery center, and the Art of Healing art and music program.

    EMAIL HOAX CLAIM #16: Oxygen Kills Cancer Cells
    Platz recommends regular exercise as a part of any healthy lifestyle, but says there is no evidence that breathing deeply or receiving oxygen therapy prevents cancer. On its Web site, the American Cancer Society includes the following statement about oxygen therapy, “Available scientific evidence does not support claims that putting oxygen releasing chemicals into a person’s body is effective in treating cancer. It may even be dangerous. There have been reports of patient deaths from this method.” Read more at www.cancer.org.

    Please pass this information on to family and friends.

     

      E-mail     Print   Mark    Size

    More in  About Us:

    About NCCN.com

    Contact NCCN.com

    Frequently Asked Questions

    NCCN Member Institutions

    NCCN Member Institution Spotlight

    Media Room - NCCN.com

    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™

    NCCN.com Team

    Advertise with NCCN.com

    NCCN Cancer Answers

     

     

     

    Advertisement

     

    Advertisement

     

    Friday
    08Jan2010

    Can red make Olympians see more gold?

    In fact, it might help.

    click on the following link to find out why:

    Is Wearing Red an Olympic Advantage?