Sue Lowden vs Harry Reid (Obama) on Health Care Reform
Wednesday, March 10, 2010 at 18:39 If you have been just too busy with multiple jobs, family and other responsibilties to get the facts on Obama’s plan for heatlh care reform, you might be swayed by the claims from Sue Lowden. She would have you believe that the Democrat plan is a “one size fits all’ approach”.
There are just a few things that I’d like to point out.
It’s been tough to keep track of all the various proposed parts of the House and Senate health care proposals, but I can tell you this - they were crafted by hundreds of members of Congress. Laying it all at Harry Reid’s door - like he wrote it - is ludicrous. The final bill will be a hybrid of what the House came up with (not a public option, but not terrible) and the Senate bill (not as good as the House bill ) and what the White House has proposed.
Maybe Sue Lowden isn’t able to keep up with it any better than some of the rest of us out here in the sagebrush.
To keep it simple, you don’t have to look any further than the White House website for the Clif Notes version, as follows:
“At this moment, we are being called upon to fulfill our duty to the citizens of this nation
and to future generations… I don’t know how passing health care will play politically, but
I do know that it’s the right thing to do. It’s right for our families. It’s right for our
businesses. It’s right for the United States of America.”
– PRESIDENT OBAMA
Americans across this country agree that our health care system is broken: Unaccountable
insurance companies ration care, soaring premiums cripple the budgets of our businesses and families, and vital care remains out of reach for far too many. The time for change has come.
President Obama’s final proposal incorporates the best ideas from both parties to put
Americans in control of our own health care.
HERE’ S WHAT THE PRES IDENT’ S PLAN FOR HEALTH REFORM WILL DO:
PROTECT AMERICANS FROM INSURANCE COMPANY ABUSES
• You will never be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions
• You will never be hit with arbitrary premium hikes
• You will never see your coverage revoked just when you get sick or injured
• You will never face unlimited out-of-pocket expenses for your care
GUARANTEE AFFORDABLE CHOICES
• If you like your current doctor and you like your current plan, you keep them
• Uninsured individuals and small business owners will become part of a powerful negotiating pool, just like members of Congress and other federal employees, lowering prices and increasing choice
• Struggling middle-class families will receive a tax credit to make coverage even more
affordable – the largest middle class tax cut for health care in history
REDUCE THE COST OF CARE FOR OUR FAMILIES, BUSINESSES
AND THE GOVERNMENT
• We’ll save billions of dollars every year by reducing waste and abuse in our current system
• We’ll save and create millions of jobs, raise wages and strengthen the economy
• We’ll cut the deficit by nearly $1 trillion over two decades
Nah, that doesn’t sound like a ‘one size fits all plan’ at all. In fact, it sounds like the kind of plan Republicans out across the country have said they wanted … one just like Members of Congress.
It could be better ( as a single-payer ) but if you want the same thing as Congress, here it is.
“So how much higher do premiums have to rise until we do something about it? How
many more Americans have to lose their health insurance? How many more businesses
have to drop coverage? How many more years can the federal budget handle the crushing
costs of Medicare and Medicaid? When is the right time for health insurance reform?”– PRESIDENT OBAMA
IF WE DO NOT PASS HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM:
Up to 17 million more people will be uninsured by 2019 than today.
The average family’s health care costs will nearly double by 2020, from $13,000 to $24,000
— meaning they’ll be paying a quarter of their income toward health care costs.
Insurers can continue the massive and arbitrary premium rate increases we’ve heard about
recently — such as Anthem Blue Cross raising rates for customers in California by nearly
40%, and rates in Illinois going up by as much as 60%.
As many as 275,000 people could die prematurely over the next 10 years because they
don’t have health insurance.
Health care costs will take up a staggering amount of our national budget. In 1960, it was 5
percent of gross domestic product (GDP), last year it was 17 percent. Costs will reach 21
percent of our economy by 2020 if we fail to act.
Rapidly rising costs will make it harder for employers — particularly small businesses — to
provide quality health insurance to employees, leading many to drop coverage or shift to
plans that cover less.
Even those who have insurance today will be less secure, and more likely to lose coverage if
they switch jobs or lose their job due to rising costs on the individual market or being
denied coverage due to a pre-existing condition.
Hmmmm, none of that stuff sounds very good - especially to this cancer patient.
“I HAVE INSURANCE THROUGH MY WORK.”
Keep your doctor and plan if you like it, but your plan will be strengthened and you’ll be protected from insurance company abuses.
According to the independent and non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, people who get coverage
through their employer today will likely see lower premiums.
If you like the health plan you have, you will be able to keep it.
The President’s proposal will strengthen the coverage you get at work by reining in the worst insurance company abuses.
Nothing about the President’s proposal will interfere with the choice of doctors you have today, or cause you to change the coverage you have at work today.
Again, nothing there sounds like a horrible, regressive mandate that we’ll all have to bow to. Which is what Sue Lowden would have us think.
It’s simply not the case.
It’s time Sue stuck to issues that she can speak truthfully about.














Reader Comments (2)
Nicely worded, maven.
I too am a cancer survivor. One of these days, I'll tell you my story (if interested).
Back to the venerable Ms. Sue Lowden though.
Senator Reid has been blasting her to pieces lately. Probably for two reasons...
1. She appears to be the Republican Party front runner to challenge him. She sure has the money to out distance Mr. Tarkanian.
2. The ads that Ms. Lowden has come up with are nothing but lies, untruths, Republican Party re-packaged talking points and pretty much stuff that gullible tea bag party people would believe in and be fearmongered by. So, Senator Reid has basically been picking her apart and going after her credentials (which there are none).
Another thing is that Ms. Sue Lowden proclaims she can take care of the people of Nevada and she identifies with them.
Wrong. Because of two reasons:
1. She's basically a millionaire. I'm sorry, but if you make a helluva lot of money, you really have very little to identify with for people like...welll...like....me.
2. She claims she is a business woman. And the business is running casinos. And they are badly run casinos too. From my experience in Nevada, people affiliated with running casinos and mixing politics with them really, really don't work. This was evidenced by when Mr. Steve Wynn showed up on a panel of discussion on CNN one Sunday and basically made an ass of himself, not to mention embarassing everyone in the entire State of Nevada, not only Las Vegas.
Those reasons above just add to the mix.
Ms. Lowden don't bring anything of value that merits her even in contention for running for Senator of Nevada.
She just needs to quit this nonsense, go back to being a high maintenance soccer mom and take up worthy charities, buy expensive art and talk gossip with the other rich folks and leave us ordinary people alone.
Because if she were elected, she would just sit there all prim and proper on the bench, then when a vote comes up, she'll look over at her fellow GOoPers, find out what they want to do, then vote no, thus ensuring she plays party politics and disregards her constituents.
I remind you we already have an asshole like that serving. As evidenced by that lower-than-pond-scum Senator John Ensign voting no on the jobs bill. But he's another story. Senator Ensign has disappeared from the public eye (except for written prepared stuff, but no one-on-one with a reporter discussions). He avoids the press. He pays attention to high priced lawyers who caution him on what to say and do, not to mention paying their exorbitant fees. Basically, for someone who proclaims they are innocent of all wrongdoing, he SURE acts like he's a guilty lieing through his teeth son of a bitch. Anyways, the way things are going for him, he'll be chucked out of office, convicted of a felony and end up watching the 2012 elections in a desert prison with Mr. O.J. Simpson as his neighbor in the next cell over.
hey, there sailor. I'm ALWAYS interested in hearing another survivors story!
And, thanks for the excellent - and always entertaining - analysis, too.