UNR Get's Cuts. AB 449 Get's Sandoval's Undying Love and Support
Tuesday, April 5, 2011 at 09:20 Let me see if I get this right. The Governor’s draconian budget cuts have finally gotten the quiet UNR President Milton Glick to finally step onto the front page of today’s RGJ and kindly refer to the $59 million cuts as a “game changer”. (The full text of his comments are below).
Just below that headline, there is another story about an “ambitious economic development bill (AB449)” that was introduced, which Governor Sandoval says will cure damn near everything wrong with the state.
WTF? How many economic development canards has this state seen in the last 40 years? And here, they’re trying to sell us another one! Gee, if it creates jobs, it must be good? Right? Ask instead, does it create sustainable jobs, and better yet, sustainable communities.
Here’s some heresy: A new job doesn’t always create a better balance sheet for communities.
If economic development councils worked so damn well, why are we in the pickle we’re in right now? And, furthermore, how is our deluded Governorship going to convince business and industry to come to Nevada when the state can only boast one of the worst K-12 and higher education systems in the nation?
The FactCheckers at the Reno Gazette-Journal could do us all a huge favor and expose the lie that is ‘Economic Development’ councils/commissions/study groups. Talking about auditing the mining industry, how about auditing these black holes for tax dollars to ensure they produce what they promise.
It always sounds so good. ‘We’re gonna take a real look at our economic development efforts … blah, blah, blah and bring in new businesses to our state… blah, blah and create jobs!’ During times of financial stress - like now - I think you could sell Nevadans anything to promises to create jobs and pulls us out of the hole we’re in.
But please tell me how that will work with a wrecked and broken educational system. I’m sorry, but this is putting the cart before the horse. Worse, there are Democrats in Nevada who step up to support this - like John Oceguera, D-Las Vegas.
Here’s why I believe the Monkey See-Monkey Do of ‘Economic Development’ should get a hard second look:
Economic Development efforts relieve local and state officials from having to the do the hard work of creating real cities and towns - communities with that often intangible ‘something’ to offer that draws investment from our neighbors.
Constantly at the top of that list of ‘something’ is a first rate educational environment. Placing close behind that are liveable communities, richly textured with less suburban sprawl, more arts and entertainment, diverse options for shopping, housing and mobility. The old economic drivers of safety, leadership and services are more often led today by aesthetics in communities that are not dominated by the car-centered culture of the 1950’s-1990’s.
Successful communities - like Portland, Oregon - happen more organically, with a focus less upon buying ‘off the shelf’ packaged ‘solutions’ to their problems and more taking hard, honest looks at who they want to be and working within that. Nevada’s leaders have bought into the fantasy that they can spend their way back from the fiscal brink by offering ever more ‘incentives’ to bring business in - with the hope that another new industry/factory/distribution center would somehow create that ideal city where people just want to be.
This sort of old-thinking belies the real reasons people live where they live, and how economic growth flows from that (rather than the other way around!).
Knight Soul of the Community 2010 - National from Knight Foundation on Vimeo.
Governor Sandoval, we’ve run out of things to give away. We’re fresh out of ‘incentives’. Will you please quit selling the same-old, same-old Ponzi Scheme of Economic Development? How do you plan to commercialize research from broken university systems?
Jobs and growth are the results of good economic and community planning, not a proxy for that.
Take a look at the Strategic Plan for Los Angeles County. Where do you see further tax breaks mentioned as an incentive to bring business in?
The overwhelming number of businesses in the United States have 10 employees or less. Visionary communities aren’t just seeking the next BIG industry or company to bring in from the outside, but rather how to nurture and grow from the inside outward, their own native talent - bright entreprenuers who live here because it’s the best place to live … not here just on account of the tax breaks. Tax breaks are only as good as the underlying economy. As soon as your neighbor offers a better one, those relying on that alone will be gone in a heartbeat.
Again, livable communities with solid educational credentials provide that rich soil for entreprenuerial growth and resulting economic prowess. Not more ‘Economic Development’ committees seeking to further cannabalize the picked clean bones of what’s left of a shattered economy, or steal from their neighbors.
The most sought after industries are the creative/knowledge economy. The Kaufman Foundation has published a report which outlines where the states stand right now (Nevada is number 30) in their attempts to develop economically through this recession, and how those states who will be successful might actually do it. Again, the same old cannabalistic economic development programs aren’t going to be models for new thinking.
Sprawl repair could put a lot of Nevadans back to work. Urban sprawl - particularly in places where land has been historically cheap and under-utilized such as Nevada - is contributing to negative perceptions of our state. Probably far more than the occasional whore house.
GenY want’s to walk. They’re willing to pay a premium for it. These are your entreprenurial, knowledge/creative businesses of the future. They don’t want to live out in BFE … or Spanish Springs, or Silver Springs, or Fernley and commute. That’s so 1960’s. Their grandparents day. Where do you see the great bulk of foreclosures? Out in the sprawl. This doesn’t even account for the millions of boomers who want to age in place.
Do this hard work to repair sprawl, and the good businesses will come flocking.
So, at the end of the day, all AB449 says to me is ‘more old thinking’ and hanging desperately to what seemed to work in the past. Keep doing things the way you’ve always done them, the old Incident Command instructor told us, you’ll keep on getting the results you’ve always gotten. Except when it comes to ‘Economic Development’ we don’t actually know how well it’s worked - especially during the tough times. We’re guessing. We can’t afford to guess anymore.
It’s time to repair the educational system in Nevada, and quit with the magical thinking of ‘Economic Development’. These type of initiatives merely serve to obscure what really needs to be done to improve our states communities and make them the real drivers for sustainable growth and progress.
-maven
If you’re concerned - as you should be - here is the full text of President Glick’s comments:











